You need to login before you can view or download document
Trash management - consequences for soil carbon and nitrogen
By Robertson, FA : 1; Thorburn, PJ : 2
When sugarcane (Sacharum spp.) trash is burnt, organic matter and nutrients are lost;
whereas under the green cane trash blanketing (GCTB) system, they are retained. This
has led to speculation that soil organic matter and nutrient levels may be increasing in
GCTB systems, allowing fertiliser applications to be reduced. We investigated the
effects of sugarcane trash management (burnt or GCTB) on indicators of short- and
long-term soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling. The burnt and GCTB systems were
compared in 5 field experiments at 3 locations with widely differing climates\. Soil and
trash were sampled eight to 10 times over one (12-month) season in each experiment.
At the time of this study, the experiments had been running for between one and six
years. Under GCTB, trash containing 7-12 t dry matter/ha, 3000--5000 kg C/ha, and
30--60 kg N/ha was deposited on the soil surface at harvest. Most of the dry matter
(>85%) was decomposed during the subsequent 12 months. In the oldest experiments,
3-6 years of GCTB increased total N, organic C and microbial biomass C in the soiL
These changes were largely restricted to the upper 20 or 50 mm. In the youngest
experiments, 1-2 years of GCTB had no effect on total or microbial C and N levels.
Short-term laboratory incubations of soil showed that microbial respiration was greater
under GCTB, particularly in the older experiments. Concomitant net mineralisation of
N, however, generally did not differ significantly between trash management
treatments. The ratio (C mineralisation : N mineralisation) indicated greater
immobilisation of N in GCTB than in burnt soils. The effect of GCTB on soil properties
increased with increasing cumulative returns of C and N. Approximately 10--20% of
cumulative C returns were measured as soil organic C and 40--100% of cumulative N
returns measured as total soil N. We combined measured rates of decomposition and
accumulation of C and N with assumptions about the mineralisation of C and N in trash
left from previous years, and calculated equilibrium C and N balances for two soils that
differed in total C and N. These calculations suggested that GCTB could cause soil
organic C to increase by 1.5-14% and soil total N to increase by 1.5-21% in the top
250 mm of these soils. The increases in total C and N and time to equilibrium were
highly dependent on the rate of trash decomposition.