THE USE OF SUGARCANE TOPS FOR LIVESTOCK FEED: A STUDY OF TOPS HARVEST AND CROP IMPACTS
By G.J. HAM, R. COCCO
IN A TIME of low sugar prices and consequent reduced farm income, a small group of
Burdekin growers formed a consortium to investigate the potential for harvesting cane
tops to produce stockfeed, after minimal processing. Their aim was to produce the
product for both export and domestic use. Market research indicated that a viable
industry of this kind was possible, but little was known of the yields of material
available for processing to supply such a market. With the financial assistance of the
QDPI Burdekin Rangelands to Reef Initiative and Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations,
this investigation was undertaken to fill the gaps in the knowledge necessary to carry
this project to fruition. Two trials were established in erect cane crops scheduled for
mid-season and late-season harvest, with removal of tops staggered throughout the
drying-off period for the crop. The timing of individual harvest of tops was determined
by the last irrigation and the scheduled time for crop harvest. Data collected included
fresh weight of tops and biomass of tops per hectare for tops cut both above and below
the growing point, cane yields from the remaining crop harvested for normal mill
processing, and impacts of the topping procedures on CCS and juice quality parameters.
In addition, samples were analysed for organochlorine and organophosphate pesticide
residues. Fresh weight and biomass of tops harvested below the growing point generally
exceeded those for tops cut above the growing point, with yields for both influenced by
the time interval for harvest of tops prior to normal crop harvest. The removal of tops
prior to the scheduled crop harvest did not have an adverse impact on final crop yield,
but there was a significant reduction in CCS when the tops were removed below the
growing point 5 weeks before harvest. A downward, non-significant trend in CCS was
apparent in both trials when tops were removed more than 3–4 weeks prior to harvest.
The financial returns from tops harvested for stockfeed would necessarily need to be
measured against any loss in value of the harvested crop due to any reduction of CCS
following early removal of tops. In both trials, the lowest ranked juice purity level was
that for tops removal below the growing point for the earliest tops cutting time. This is
in line with the decreases in CCS noted for these treatments. There were no other
significant adverse impacts on juice-quality parameters associated with early removal of
tops. No pesticide residues were found in the tops material, indicating it could be used
safely for stockfeed. It was evident from this investigation that harvest of tops for
stockfeed production could be carried out successfully without adverse impact on crop
production, provided that the tops were harvested within 3–4 weeks of the scheduled
crop harvest.