RESISTANCE COMPONENTS IN BURDEKIN SUGARCANE VARIETIES TO DAMAGE BY GREYBACK CANEGRUBS
By A. HORSFIELD, A.R. RATTEY and P.G. ALLSOPP
CURRENT control strategies for greyback canegrub (Dermolepida albohirtum)
are integrated in the GrubPlan program. Grubplan does not include a plantresistance
component such as tolerance, antibiosis or antixenosis. In field trials
in the Burdekin region, we created differential populations of greyback
canegrubs within commercial varieties to determine levels of canegrub
tolerance. Our results did not confirm the antixenosis hypothesis that crop height
influences oviposition by beetles. The majority of varieties had similar levels of
tolerance to canegrub damage for cane yield and sugar yield. There was
evidence that Q183A and Q208A were more resistant to grub infestation. Q183A
demonstrated tolerance mechanisms including less proneness to stool tipping
and vigorous ratoon shoot production. The greater resistance of Q208A was
attributed to either antibiosis or antixenosis, although further research is required
to determine which of these resistance components are present with Q208A.