By Y. EVERINGHAM, G. INMAN-BAMBER, C. TICEHURST, D. BARRETT, K. LOWE and T. McNEILL
MARKETERS rely on early and accurate yield forecasts to increase industry
profitability by improved forward selling strategies. Crop forecasts are required
6–7 months prior to the commencement of harvest. These forecasts need to be
updated regularly during the growing season. In this paper, we describe how
crop growth models and remote sensing models can be used to provide
Queensland Sugar Limited with yield forecast information. An assessment
demonstrating how these approaches would have performed in ‘forecast mode’
using historical yields for the Mackay terminal region is presented. Each method
has varied strengths and weaknesses. For this region, the remote sensing model
has produced more accurate yield forecasts than the crop growth model.
However, the remote sensing model cannot be used until later in the growing
season. Conversely, an advantage of the crop growth model is that it can be
utilised much earlier in the season when marketers have more flexibility in
planning. While these desktop models are still under development, and need to
be benchmarked against forecasts that have been provided historically by
industry, the crop and remote sensing models offer marketers advance
knowledge about the size of the forthcoming crop. This information is
invaluable to marketers who manage the forward sales of sugar.